TAAT EVALUATION OF PARTNERS; OFSP ASPECTS, INFLUENCE ON COMMUNITY AND COVID19 EFFECTS

Description	Results
Interview period	08-Nov-2021 to 28-Nov-2021
Total number of Respondents	50 [Male:0 Female:0]
Number of Districts/ ADDs/ LGAs	22

p5. Interviewed partner representatives categorised by sex [All Countries]

Code	Description	Freq	Percent
00	Female	21	42.00
01	Male	29	58.00
	Overall	50	100.00

p7. Designations of partner representatives interviewed [All Countries]

Code	Description	Freq	Percent
01	Monitoring and Evaluation	2	4.00
02	Health Worker	4	8.00
03	Agricultural Officer	12	24.00
05	Managing Director	1	2.00
06	CEO	1	2.00
07	Owner/ Founder	3	6.00
95	Other	27	54.00
	Overall	50	100.00

p8. Number of staff of the partner organization/entity directly engaged in OFSP value chains [All Countries]

Code	Description	Freq	Percent
01	1-4 Employees	12	24.00
02	5-9 Employees	10	20.00
03	10-49 Employees	20	40.00
04	50-249 Employees	3	6.00
05	250 employees or more	5	10.00
	Overall	50	100.00

p9. Aspects of the OFSP value chain partners are engaged in [All Countries]

Note: results are from multiple-choice responses
Code	Description	Freq	Percent
01	Sweetpotato breeding	9	3.38
02	Input supply	13	4.89
03	Vine supply to beneficiaries/ vine buying from vine multipliers	30	11.28
04	Soil fertility management	8	3.01
05	Soil and water conservation	9	3.38
06	Pest and disease management	15	5.64
07	Harvest and Post-harvest management	15	5.64
08	Marketing of OFSP	25	9.40
09	Processing of OFSP	23	8.65
10	Livestock feeding e.g through use of silage	11	4.14
11	Value addition	24	9.02
12	Nutrition	19	7.14
13	Technology dissemination	19	7.14
14	Advocacy	18	6.77
15	Research (general)	13	4.89
16	Policy	5	1.88
95	Other	10	3.76
	Overall	266	100.00

p10. Aspects of the OFSP value chain in which partners collaborates with CIP/TAAT project [All Countries]

Note: results are from multiple-choice responses
Code	Description	Freq	Percent
01	Sweetpotato breeding	5	2.75
02	Input supply	9	4.95
03	Vine supply to beneficiaries/ vine buying from vine multipliers	26	14.29
04	Soil fertility management	3	1.65
05	Soil and water conservation	5	2.75
06	Pest and disease management	9	4.95
07	Harvest and Post-harvest management	11	6.04
08	Marketing of OFSP	17	9.34
09	Processing of OFSP	19	10.44
10	Livestock feeding e.g through use of silage	7	3.85
11	Value addition	19	10.44
12	Nutrition	16	8.79
13	Technology dissemination	16	8.79
14	Advocacy	11	6.04
15	Research (general)	8	4.40
16	Policy	1	0.55
	Overall	182	100.00

p12. Why is it important for partners to collaborate with CIP/TAAT on OFSP aspects [All Countries]

Note: results are from multiple-choice responses
Code	Description	Freq	Percent
01	Promoting OFSP- Orange Fleshed Sweetpotato	39	29.10
02	Reducing Malnutrition	32	23.88
03	Promoting Vitamin A intake	36	26.87
95	Other	27	20.15
	Overall	134	100.00

p17a. Have partner activities implemented with CIP been affected by COVID-19? [All Countries]

Code	Description	Freq	Percent
00	No	7	14.00
01	Yes	43	86.00
	Overall	50	100.00

p17b. In what ways were partner activities implemented with CIP been affected by COVID-19? [All Countries]

Note: results are from multiple-choice responses
Code	Description	Freq	Percent
01	Most of target groups had Covid-19	2	1.63
02	Difficulty in finding labour	12	9.76
03	Difficulty in getting raw materials	12	9.76
04	Travel restrictions made it difficult to implement project	25	20.33
05	Government forced closure complicated the implementation	19	15.45
06	Limiting number of people per vehicle made implementation more expensive	14	11.38
07	Reducing number of staff in offices	8	6.50
08	Many product suppliers closed business	11	8.94
95	Other Reasons (Specify)	20	16.26
	Overall	123	100.00

p18. Suggestion on how partners collaboration with CIP/TAAT can be strengthened [All Countries]

Note: results are from multiple-choice responses
Code	Description	Freq	Percent
01	Increase Funding	28	22.22
02	Improve on Communications	21	16.67
03	Increase number of trainings	36	28.57
04	Provide brochures and Leaflets	15	11.90
95	Other	26	20.63
	Overall	126	100.00